And We Wonder Why Blogger is Listed as a Corporate Sex Offender
I got this email recently:
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:23:32 -0800
From: "Blogger Help" Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: me
Subject: [#94226188] TOS Violation, Blog*Spot
Hello,
We'd like to inform you that we've received a complaint regarding your blog http://rookiee.blogspot.com/ . Upon review, we've noted that your blog is not in compliance with Blogger Terms of Service(http://www.blogger.com/terms.g). As a result, we've been forced to remove a comment from your blog.
Thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
The Blogger Team
LOL! Understanding? Yeah, I understand, alright. My blog violates their TOS somehow, while pedophiles are perfectly allowed to talk about having sex with children. It all makes PERFECT sense.
Anyhow, I don't know what comment they removed, but I don't remember violating their non-existent TOS. Just goes to show you. I reckon I ought to back this blog up now.
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:23:32 -0800
From: "Blogger Help"
To: me
Subject: [#94226188] TOS Violation, Blog*Spot
Hello,
We'd like to inform you that we've received a complaint regarding your blog http://rookiee.blogspot.com/ . Upon review, we've noted that your blog is not in compliance with Blogger Terms of Service(http://www.blogger.com/terms.g). As a result, we've been forced to remove a comment from your blog.
Thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
The Blogger Team
LOL! Understanding? Yeah, I understand, alright. My blog violates their TOS somehow, while pedophiles are perfectly allowed to talk about having sex with children. It all makes PERFECT sense.
Anyhow, I don't know what comment they removed, but I don't remember violating their non-existent TOS. Just goes to show you. I reckon I ought to back this blog up now.
7 Comments:
Don't worry; I did.
Prolly some comment a pervy boy made and reported enmass in order to get their attention right away. They deleted the crappy comment, but obviously the content is fine :)
We back up our blog - to make sure it remains online (even if blogspot gets happy fingers over pervs' crying about it).
Yah, I usually do, but it had been a while. I've got a host to host it anytime I need (and no, it isn't Karl lol), so if blogger gets a wild hair, I'll just put it back up real quick. It wouldn't surprise me, if they have some pedos on their staff, the way they're handling this.
Wow, now this is just disgusting. It would be very interesting to know how long it took for them to respond to that complaint seeing as they don't seem particularlly concerned about hosting Illegal Child Pornography.
This is why it's all the more important that we get this act to pass.
I'd love to see the look on Eric Schmidts face when he finds himself under investigation by the FBI and in debt to the government several hundred thousand dollars for hosting material encouraging child abuse.
shocked!
I am wondering if you asked which comment like llort said.
I would be very curious.
And why wouldn't they include what they deleted in this email?
wonder if it was to do with the russia thing? (I think a comment was deleted from that thread...?)
Post a Comment
<< Home