Wednesday, December 06, 2006

SSC and Pedophile Websites

This will likely be the strangest post I'll ever make.

You all have heard of BDSM and S&M, I assume. Otherwise, don't read this post (oh, and if you're under 18, don't read it either, since google doesn't give a fuck who reads these adult-oriented blogs).

Anyway, back in the day before porn shops sold oodles of velcro bondage kits, BDSMers were seen as abusers and violent people. Now, they're out and proud, gathering at conventions in hotels and other places across the country.

But, but, they HIT people! Yep, the ones who're out and about mostly do hit people, and the other half of them (or more) are out and about, looking for someone to hit them. I'm talking about adults -- people who can consent.

Just like NAMBLA, BDSM activists tried to align themselves with the gay movement, and they succeeded. Why did they succeed, and why didn't NAMBLA?

Well, one of the big things that be BDSM community did that got them more acceptance was come up with the "SSC" thing. I think they have Slave David to blame, I mean, credit for that, but I'm not positive (look it up if you want to know). Anyway, SSC means Safe, Sane and Consensual. The word "Consensual" comes from the word "Consensus," by the way, and not "Consent," which I think is important. Once this was passed around as the way they could talk to people about it, there was a big lot of acceptance from other people about it. Okay, cool, they're safe, they're adults who're agreeing about it, cool, just don't do it in front of me or my children.

The pedos are trying to devise their own form of SSC lately, I've noticed. They say that it's consensual, they say they don't hurt anyone, not really, and they say that they're sane.

We know that they're wrong on all counts. Some grown person wants a spanking from another grown person, or WHATEVER? Fine with me.

I'll never believe that a child can consent, or that any group of people besides sociopathic pedophiles will ever reach consensus that it's okay to do that.

This is another Keep Your Eyes Open post, about how they try to use other groups' tactics to try to convince the "mainstream" that what they're trying to do is okay.

It never will be.

6 Comments:

Blogger jacey said...

I'll never believe that a child can consent, or that any group of people besides sociopathic pedophiles will ever reach consensus that it's okay to do that.

Well said,

At the end of the day there's nothing wrong with whatever consenting adults want to do with each other, but there's everything wrong with adults and minors in sexual relations.

Nice post. :)

10:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Absolutely no child can consent.

3:36 PM  
Blogger Stitches77 said...

I found it interesting once on one of Rookieeeee's podcasts, he had a guest olStNik who stated absolutely that 80% of women could not have an orgasm unless they're with a dominate partner. He gave a BDSM website as his statistical source. Just an example about the dishonesty so rampant in the pedovore community and stats that are so frequently stated with authority and absolute knowledge.

They do the same thing with the consent issue. It should be illegal for people to be so stupid.

11:14 AM  
Blogger rookiee said...

Haha, stitches, it's amazing what some people will say. A dominate partner, indeed. -snicker-

2:35 PM  
Blogger Visaman666 said...

When you say that no child can consent. Are you talking about pre-teens? Some people consider children to be under 21.

The age of consent in Canada is 14, and has been since the late 1800's.

I am 42, but I am still my Mother's child.

9:07 PM  
Blogger rookiee said...

This is being broadcast from the US, where are kids are kids, and adults can drink and die for their country (yes, I love the canteens). I'm also cheering for those in Canadia who're pushing for the AoC to be higher. :)

9:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home