And We Wonder Why Blogger is Listed as a Corporate Sex Offender

I got this email recently:

Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:23:32 -0800
From: "Blogger Help" Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: me
Subject: [#94226188] TOS Violation, Blog*Spot


Hello,

We'd like to inform you that we've received a complaint regarding your blog http://rookiee.blogspot.com/ . Upon review, we've noted that your blog is not in compliance with Blogger Terms of Service(http://www.blogger.com/terms.g). As a result, we've been forced to remove a comment from your blog.

Thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,
The Blogger Team


LOL! Understanding? Yeah, I understand, alright. My blog violates their TOS somehow, while pedophiles are perfectly allowed to talk about having sex with children. It all makes PERFECT sense.

Anyhow, I don't know what comment they removed, but I don't remember violating their non-existent TOS. Just goes to show you. I reckon I ought to back this blog up now.

Opposition = Repression?

One thing I keep reading around the net is that the pedophiles ponder antis' motivations, and blame our behavior on being repressed pedophiles ourselves. How ridiculous is that? Does this mean that all the mothers against drunk drivers secretly yearn to be drunk drivers who run over kids? Do the cops and people who detest murderers secretly desire to murder people?

UH, no.

And, hey, does that mean that the rabid festering pedophiles who rage about peej and antis all the time are secretly people who prefer to have sex with adults who can consent to it?

UH, no.

Our motivation to get you creeps off the internet and into jails where you belong comes from disgust at your selfish and grotesque obsession with having sex with children. Again I'll say: That will NEVER be accepted. Say what you want about the REST OF THE WORLD'S motivations to be rid of you, but that is the bottom line.

We want you gone.

Updates on pedohosting

Well, boychat should go down any minute now, if Steadfast/Karl was being honest to X about it.

GC, BL and CBLF have moved to a russian provider which has assured someone that the pedophiles are not welcome there, either. Not sure how long it will be before they take them down -- a bit of a language barrier.

So. :)

And now for the giggles:
"Xavier von Hitler.
Posted by Nose on 2006-December-12 20:34:26, Tuesday
Well it looks like von Hitler failed at getting boychat and boylinks off of the net. Do any of you know of any more plans of his?"

Hah! Hahaha! Hahahhahaha! Nice timing, dude.

Open Post Day

Go ahead! Post your comments! I will not delete any of them. :)

SSC and Pedophile Websites

This will likely be the strangest post I'll ever make.

You all have heard of BDSM and S&M, I assume. Otherwise, don't read this post (oh, and if you're under 18, don't read it either, since google doesn't give a fuck who reads these adult-oriented blogs).

Anyway, back in the day before porn shops sold oodles of velcro bondage kits, BDSMers were seen as abusers and violent people. Now, they're out and proud, gathering at conventions in hotels and other places across the country.

But, but, they HIT people! Yep, the ones who're out and about mostly do hit people, and the other half of them (or more) are out and about, looking for someone to hit them. I'm talking about adults -- people who can consent.

Just like NAMBLA, BDSM activists tried to align themselves with the gay movement, and they succeeded. Why did they succeed, and why didn't NAMBLA?

Well, one of the big things that be BDSM community did that got them more acceptance was come up with the "SSC" thing. I think they have Slave David to blame, I mean, credit for that, but I'm not positive (look it up if you want to know). Anyway, SSC means Safe, Sane and Consensual. The word "Consensual" comes from the word "Consensus," by the way, and not "Consent," which I think is important. Once this was passed around as the way they could talk to people about it, there was a big lot of acceptance from other people about it. Okay, cool, they're safe, they're adults who're agreeing about it, cool, just don't do it in front of me or my children.

The pedos are trying to devise their own form of SSC lately, I've noticed. They say that it's consensual, they say they don't hurt anyone, not really, and they say that they're sane.

We know that they're wrong on all counts. Some grown person wants a spanking from another grown person, or WHATEVER? Fine with me.

I'll never believe that a child can consent, or that any group of people besides sociopathic pedophiles will ever reach consensus that it's okay to do that.

This is another Keep Your Eyes Open post, about how they try to use other groups' tactics to try to convince the "mainstream" that what they're trying to do is okay.

It never will be.

Let's see if this works. A poll

We all love it when they're outed. And there's a rash of outings lately. :) So, here's your wishlist. Who do you want to see outed?

The Outing Poll

If your answer is "other," please elaborate in comments. If there are any on the list who have already been outed, please let me know. :) AND if anyone can help me with this poll thing, let me know. :)